Check fraud may seem like an "old-fashioned" crime, but recent data paint a clear picture: it's a growing threat to banks.
For example, a 2025 AFP (Association for Financial Professionals) survey found that 63% of organizations reported experiencing check fraud in 2024.
Although digital payments dominate, fraudsters increasingly target checks, especially those used for high-value transactions.
This article explores how modern check fraud is handled by operations teams and the tools banks need to stay ahead.
The investigation of check frauds involves identifying, analyzing, and responding to fraudulent check activity. It includes examining forged, altered, or stolen checks, identifying fraud patterns, and applying tools like behavioral analytics and real-time monitoring.
Furthermore, financial institutions often collaborate with law enforcement to trace perpetrators and improve security systems.
Investigating check fraud today comes with several major obstacles:
Check usage has declined, but check fraud is still on the rise, and the checks still circulating increasingly carry higher monetary value.
The Federal Reserve reports that while paper check usage continues to decline, the average value per check has risen, reaching approximately $2,738 in 2024, up from $2,692 in 2023. This upward trend in transaction value means that each fraud incident now carries greater financial risk.
With check volume down, some banks have reduced specialized check-processing staff and budgets.
Yet regulators still expect strong anti-fraud controls, even as check volume declines. With fewer checks, banks often reduce resources, creating gaps that fraudsters exploit. The result is a growing challenge: doing more with less to defend against check fraud.
As banks tighten old loopholes, criminals continue to invent new ones. Today's check fraud is faster, harder to detect, and increasingly digital. Investigators face growing complexity as tactics evolve and fraud becomes more professionalized.
Consider the following trends:
Innovation cuts both ways. As banks adopt advanced tools to fight fraud, fraudsters use the same technologies to stay ahead. The result is an ongoing arms race that challenges even the most prepared institutions. Notable developments in this field include:
Fragmented processes and limited data sharing across the financial ecosystem often hinder efforts to investigate check fraud. With multiple stakeholders involved, coordination challenges persist.
Key obstacles include:
Determining who ultimately pays can be extremely complex.
For example, if a fraudster deposits a stolen check and the payor's bank bounces it, the presenting (deposit-taking) bank might have to absorb the loss. Different states can interpret the Uniform Commercial Code differently.
So, investigators often must balance uncovering the fraud and figuring out loss allocation.
Investigating check fraud requires speed, structure, and teamwork.
While the exact steps may vary, most banks follow a process that looks like this:
The process starts when a check triggers suspicion through monitoring systems, teller reports, or customer complaints.
Common signs include:
Once flagged, the case is logged and prioritized.
A thorough investigation often requires collaboration across departments. Core team members may include:
Before digging deeper, investigators outline what's suspected, which accounts are involved, and the timeframe.
Clear boundaries help keep the case focused.
Investigators collect everything relevant - check images, account history, CCTV footage, mail logs, login records, and customer statements.
They look for signs of forgery or tampering and confirm whether the account and check details align.
This includes account holders, bank staff, and anyone linked to the transaction. Structured interviews help clarify facts and spot inconsistencies.
Not every case is criminal. Investigators determine whether the issue was a simple error or an actual fraud attempt and assess who's liable under banking rules.
Investigators report confirmed cases to FinCEN by filing a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) and refer larger fraud rings to the U.S. Postal Inspection Service or the FBI.
Banks act fast to freeze accounts, reverse transactions, or file insurance claims. Victims are reimbursed based on liability findings and bank policy.
Once the case is closed, the bank updates its fraud rules, trains staff, and alerts other departments or customers if needed. Insights may also improve detection systems in the future.
Based on evolving fraud tactics, the following best practices can help you, as a bank, to stay ahead of check fraud threats:
Deploy real-time screening tools at the point of deposit.
Systems like RTLA (Real-Time Loss Alerts) provide instant risk scores based on behavioral data and known fraud patterns. When a check is flagged, banks can immediately hold or reject it before funds are released.
VALID Systems' RTLA flags over 75% of likely charge-off checks in real-time, allowing banks to act before losses occur without slowing down legitimate transactions.
Strong controls reduce both external and insider fraud risk.
Establishing clear checks and balances within your financial operations reduces the chance of unauthorized activity going unnoticed and increases team accountability.
Banks use Positive Pay to prevent counterfeit checks by matching issued check data with checks presented for payment. Therefore, banks should encourage its use among business clients and implement it internally for high-risk accounts.
VALID's InteliFUNDS© improves Positive Pay by using fraud pattern recognition to differentiate human error from real risk. This improves matching accuracy with real-time analytics that can spot mismatches or forged data even when basic fields appear correct.
AI-driven tools are transforming check fraud detection. Financial institutions that invest in these technologies and aim to become AI-powered banks gain a critical advantage: real-time fraud detection, fewer false positives, and faster investigations that keep losses low and trust high.
VALID Systems' InteliFUNDS© delivers real-time decisions on every check deposit, enabling instant availability for up to 99% of items.
For the small percentage that needs closer review, the system pinpoints high-risk deposits, helping banks catch potential fraud before it causes loss.
Fraud detection still depends heavily on human judgment, making staff training a critical line of defense.
Building a culture of awareness and continuous learning can significantly reduce the chances of fraud slipping through unnoticed.
Educate customers on safer payment methods like ACH or Real-Time Payments.
For those still using checks, promote best practices:
Collaboration is essential when fraud crosses institutional boundaries. Work closely with law enforcement, participate in industry groups, and share relevant data (via SARs or direct communication) when patterns emerge.
Check fraud evolves, your defenses should, too.
Conduct regular reviews of fraud trends, analyze past cases for process gaps, and update policies as threats change. Work with your tech vendors to ensure you use the most current tools.
Fraud prevention starts at detection, but it’s the coordination between real-time tools and well-equipped back-office teams that stops fraud before it settles.
VALID Systems empowers ops teams with real-time scoring, post-deposit intelligence, and scalable fraud orchestration to make every fraud decision faster, smarter, and more precise.
VALID goes beyond flagging transactions; it helps investigators understand patterns, assess risk instantly, and act before losses occur.
Here's how VALID Systems strengthens your fraud investigation capabilities:
Ready to take a proactive stance against check fraud?
Schedule a free consultation with VALID Systems today and explore our real-time, data-driven approach to check fraud prevention.