Banks are encountering a growing surge in financial fraud. Industry data indicate that more than 50% of banks experienced an increase in business fraud in 2024, and over two-thirds reported higher consumer fraud that year.
However, many banks are still relying on outdated fraud detection and prevention methods, like rigid rules and manual reviews.
The key to combating this rising threat lies in embracing modern fraud detection and prevention strategies.
In this guide, we'll highlight how banks are using advanced technologies to protect against the rising wave of financial crime.
Fraud detection refers to the systems and processes that identify potentially fraudulent activity as it occurs or after it has happened.
In banking, this involves utilizing data analysis and automated rules to identify unusual or suspicious transactions.
For example, fraud detection software analyzes transactions, such as deposits or account openings, for potential red flags, including large withdrawals or mismatched signatures. Monitoring tools compare each event to typical behavior and known fraud patterns, triggering alerts when anomalies are detected.
While detection reacts to anomalies, fraud prevention uses proactive measures to prevent fraud before it occurs.
Examples include:
The importance of fraud prevention and detection is obvious, as Juniper Research forecasts an 86% market growth between 2024 and 2029, with spending expected to reach $32.2 billion by 2029.
Prevention methods, such as stricter controls and holds, reduce the likelihood of fraud; however, some attacks will still slip through. When they do, detection tools act as a safety net to identify and stop active fraud.
However, relying solely on detection can lead to constant losses, as it only identifies fraud after it has occurred. On the other hand, prevention without detection may miss evolving threats.
The key is combining both: prevention methods, such as identity checks and fraud scoring, stop basic attacks, while detection systems, like real-time monitoring, catch more sophisticated ones.
Top banks use both approaches. For example, they may implement multi-factor authentication for mobile logins (prevention) and run AI models on transactions to flag suspicious activity (detection).
Financial institutions use a wide range of tools to combat fraud. Modern solutions blend data analytics, AI, and fast decision-making:
Banks deploy software that continuously analyzes every transaction. These systems compare current activity against historical baselines and known indicators of fraud.
If a transaction deviates from a customer's typical behavior (e.g., an unusually large check deposit on a dormant account), it's flagged immediately.
Leading systems use machine learning models to detect subtle fraud patterns that simple rules might miss. ML algorithms automatically learn from new data: every confirmed fraud case refines the model.
Over time, the AI improves at spotting sophisticated attacks (e.g., a network of linked accounts used for synthetic fraud).
For example, VALID System's tools retrain daily on global data to ensure models capture emerging schemes.
By profiling typical customer behavior, banks can spot anomalies.
Banks that use AI predictive analytics experience a 60% reduction in fraud losses and 50% fewer false positives.
Analytics might track login locations, device types, or transaction timings. If a user logs in from a new country and immediately initiates a large transfer, the system raises an alert.
Behavioral scoring is also used in check processing: unusual payee names or deposit patterns trigger warnings. These behavioral tools operate across digital and physical channels.
Tools such as multi-factor authentication (MFA), biometric checks (including fingerprint or facial recognition), and device fingerprinting improve security.
When paired with fraud detection, they help confirm that the party initiating a transaction is indeed the legitimate customer.
For example, if a check deposit request comes from a suspicious device fingerprint, the system may require extra verification.
Instead of static "yes/no" rules, modern systems use fraud scoring.
Each transaction or deposit is assigned a numerical risk score based on multiple factors (amount, location, account history, payee, etc.).
High scores trigger automated holds or approvals only after manual review. The scoring models are "dynamic." For instance, a second check from the same suspicious account will compound the risk score.
This approach (sometimes called "dynamic hold rules") replaces legacy fixed hold times.
These are integrated platforms that aggregate all risk signals into one decision framework. They can ingest data from teller systems, ATM networks, online banking, and external intelligence feeds.
The platform then applies complex logic (often via rule engines and AI) to make decisions in real-time.
This approach ensures a coordinated response: for example, an alert in mobile banking might inform how teller staff handle a related request.
Some solutions use consortium data (shared networks of anonymized fraud incidents across many institutions). By comparing against a global fraud database, banks can catch repeat offenders or linked fraud rings.
A great example is the VALID Edge consortium, which analyzes over 300 million account records to identify duplicate or kited check patterns.
Advanced image analysis can detect tampering.
According to the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, altered check fraud increased 385% from 2021 to 2024, making tools that scan check images for wash marks or misaligned elements essential.
Here are the most effective practices to strengthen your fraud defenses:
Real-time risk scoring evaluates each transaction as it happens, minimizing the chances of fraud slipping through.
Action steps:
Pro tip:
Integrating Real-Time Loss Alerts (RTLA)© into your fraud detection infrastructure improves real-time scoring by providing a broader context for transaction analysis.
This system assesses transactions in real-time and applies a dynamic risk score based on several data points, minimizing the risk of fraud-related losses.
Machine learning helps detect emerging fraud tactics by constantly learning from new data, improving fraud detection over time.
Steps to implement:
Future forecasts:
AI and machine learning revolutionize fraud detection by enabling systems to adapt to new patterns. By 2025, over 60% of fraud detection systems are expected to use these technologies, thereby improving the accuracy of real-time prevention.
Multi-layered authentication strengthens the security of high-risk transactions, preventing unauthorized access to customer accounts.
Next steps to take:
Tip:
Combine device intelligence with MFA. If a transaction originates from an unfamiliar device or IP address, require additional layers of verification to reduce the chances of fraud further.
Dynamic funds availability policies improve both security and customer satisfaction by adapting to the risk level of each transaction.
Actionable measures:
Fraud alerts empower staff to act swiftly against potential threats, reducing the risk of fraud-related losses.
Immediate action:
Collaborating with other institutions through fraud consortiums helps you detect fraud patterns that individual institutions might overlook.
Action plan:
Regular audits ensure that fraud detection systems remain effective and aligned with the evolving techniques used by fraudsters.
Action items:
Compliance with financial regulations not only prevents penalties but also strengthens your fraud detection and prevention efforts.
Steps to ensure compliance:
Your institution may already be facing a surge in fraud attempts, but are your current systems equipped to respond in real time?
VALID Systems offers specialized, AI-driven fraud detection and prevention solutions, with a focus on the banking industry.
Feature |
Traditional Systems |
VALID Systems |
Check fraud detection |
Post-clearing identification |
Real-time alerts with RTLA |
Funds availability |
Fixed hold times |
Dynamic, risk-based holds (InteliFUNDS) |
Fraud scoring |
Static rules |
Adaptive AI-based scoring |
Response time |
Manual reviews, delayed |
Instant, proactive interventions |
Data updates |
Monthly or quarterly |
Retrained daily with global data |
Consortium data |
Limited or unavailable |
Access to shared intelligence (VALID Edge) |
Image tampering detection |
Not widely used |
Forensic image analysis |
Customer experience |
Delays and blocked access |
Instant access for trusted users (IFA) |
Key elements of VALID's approach include:
Real-Time Loss Alerts (RTLA)©:
A real-time fraud scoring and alerting system for check deposits. RTLA assigns a risk score to every check at the teller or ATM and delivers immediate alerts on suspicious items.
In trials, RTLA flagged over 75% of loss-bound check items before posting. This preemptive scoring provides tellers and staff with a "heads-up" to verify identities or reject high-risk deposits.
Instant Funds / IFA:
Valid's Instant Funds feature (also known as IFA) works in conjunction with fraud detection to provide legitimate customers with immediate liquidity.
Using the same risk models, it offers instant availability on good funds for a small fee, while holding back checks that score poorly.
INclearing Loss Alerts:
This tool detects altered or out-of-pattern checks that may have been tampered with between the deposit and clearing stages. It monitors the clearing process and flags any items that deviate from earlier profiles.
Is your fraud detection and prevention strategy up to date?
Partner with VALID Systems and protect your organization before fraud strikes.