Checks are still part of how businesses move money, even if they seem outdated.
Statistics from 2024 indicate that 91% of organizations continue to use checks, up from 75% the previous year. At the same time, check fraud surged, with 63% of companies reporting incidents (AFP).
The reality is clear: checks remain in circulation, and the associated risks are not only persistent – they're becoming more sophisticated.
This article breaks down the latest check fraud statistics, key trends behind the rise, and what banks can do to stay ahead of evolving fraud tactics.
Check fraud is a deceptive act involving the use of checks to obtain money or property unlawfully.
Checks once dominated U.S. payments, reaching a peak in the early 1990s with over 16 billion processed annually. While volumes have declined, their role hasn't vanished, especially for high-value transactions. Despite digital alternatives, many businesses still cut checks for high-value transactions. And where money moves, fraud follows.
Today's most common check fraud methods involve:
Let's take a closer look at what recent industry data tells us about the state of check fraud in 2025:
Year | % of organizations affected | Estimated Losses (U.S./Global) | Key trends |
2023 | 47% | $1.3B (U.S.); $26B (Global) | Mail theft, RDC fraud, synthetic identity fraud |
2024 | 63% | Projected $30B (U.S.) | BEC, AI-enhanced scams, lower recovery rates |
2025 (Predicted) | 68%+ | $35B+ (U.S.) | AI-driven forgery, deepfake check fraud |
Collectively, these data indicate that check fraud remains high in 2025, particularly in the United States.
Several factors explain why check fraud is rising now:
Fraudsters openly share stolen checks and new schemes on Telegram, WhatsApp, and other platforms.
This "democratization" of check fraud tools (templates, stolen MICR numbers, wash kits) means even amateur criminals can perpetrate check scams.
Modern printing and AI enable the creation of highly sophisticated counterfeits.
High-resolution printers, scanners, and even AI-based handwriting generation tools enable fraudsters to replicate logos, holograms, and signatures with near-perfect accuracy. Fraudsters use these tools to bypass banks' manual reviews.
U.S. mail theft has spiked.
Criminals are stealing business checks right out of mailboxes and vehicles, then washing and redepositing them.
One major case occurred in Montgomery County, Maryland, where two women led a $500,000 fraud scheme by using a stolen USPS arrow key to access mailboxes. They stole business checks, altered them with specialized tools, and attempted to cash or circulate them.
Check fraud often ties into broader scams rather than being a standalone scheme.
Romance scams, fake job or secret shopper scams, and business email compromises sometimes trick victims into depositing phony checks or sending funds via check. Each new scam floods the system with fresh fraudulent checks.
Weak internal controls continue to expose businesses to insider threats. In a 2025 case, Heather Murdock, a bookkeeper at a Hartford law firm, was indicted for embezzling over $840,000.
She created fake checks, forged signatures, and manipulated accounting records to cover her tracks. The fraud spanned years and went undetected due to her unchecked access to financial systems.
Each tactic below addresses a common weak spot that fraudsters often exploit, providing you with practical ways to strengthen your defenses:
By implementing AI image analysis, banks can catch forgeries that manual reviews overlook, such as AI-generated handwriting, altered fonts, and subtle layout changes.
This technology compares each check to known authentic patterns in real-time, flagging high-risk items before they clear.
Positive Pay remains a foundational defense, but its effectiveness depends on the depth of implementation. The more fields you validate, the harder it is for altered or counterfeit checks to clear.
Layering Positive Pay with AI-driven tools that analyze signature placement or font discrepancies significantly reduces manual errors and flags more forgeries, especially at the teller window.
Fraud detection after the fact is too late. Today's fraud occurs rapidly – banks need tools that act in real-time, not overnight.
VALID's Real-Time Loss Alerts (RTLA) flag over 75% of fraudulent checks before they clear, helping your institution to stop losses at the point of deposit, not days later in reconciliation.
Offering services that guarantee funds for verified checks can protect both financial institutions and customers from losses due to fraudulent checks.
VALID's InstantFUNDS makes a sub-second decision and guarantees those funds – the bank and customer are protected if the check bounces.
Likewise, VALID's InteliFUNDS© promises instant credit on ~99% of checks and places a hold on the riskiest 1%, with VALID covering any bounced or fraudulent cleared items.
Fraud isn't limited to one bank.
Fraud rings often test the same stolen checks or compromised accounts across multiple institutions. Shared intelligence and behavior modeling are critical.
VALID's INclearing Loss Alerts monitor activity across a shared data network, flagging suspicious check patterns, stolen item reuse, and multi-bank fraud strategies long before they hit your system.
This article laid it out clearly – check fraud isn’t fading, it’s evolving, and the data proves it. Fortunately, the strategies outlined here show it's possible to get ahead of the threat.
VALID Systems empowers the shift from reactive fraud handling to proactive prevention.
For more than 20 years, VALID has helped banks stay ahead of check fraud – refining AI decision tools and building a risk catalog with 2.5 billion unique machine learning features. Today, 8 of the top 25 U.S. financial institutions trust VALID to protect their check operations.
Key VALID products:
Are you still using outdated systems? Check fraud statistics show the risk is rising – why wait?
Schedule a demo with VALID and see why industry leaders trust us to stay ahead of today's most sophisticated check fraud tactics.